We continues with our series on the Order of Good Hope:
SOUTH AFRICA
The Order of
Good Hope
Deon Fourie
Professor in
Strategic Studies (Retd)
and Professor
Extraordinarius
of the
University of
South Africa
Department of
Political Sciences
PO Box 392
Pretoria
0003 South
Africa
Despite
the obvious need for the institution of civil honours, some thirty years passed
after the 1938 proposal before the matter attracted serious attention. Rules for the acceptance of foreign honours,
first the British Foreign Office's rules and then South African rules,
published in December, 1963, continued to bar the use of honours as diplomatic
gestures.[i] It is difficult to trace the exact course of
subsequent events. Discussions were not
recorded. However, at last on 4
September, 1969, there was a minute from the Secretary of Foreign Affairs to
members of an Interdepartmental Committee on Honours and Decorations - itself
an indication of a move towards instituting civilian honours. This minute referred to a discussion on the
need for an award for foreigners, such as diplomats, and the question of a
separate honour for distinguished service either for 'non-citizens' or to 'citizens
and non-citizens'.[ii] The possibility of a bravery award was
mentioned in passing. Another year was
to pass before the next step appeared on the file.
A
Cabinet memorandum in 1970 from the Department raised the question of how to
honour heads of state, diplomats and meritorious foreigners. A rather poorly conceived Decoration for
Meritorious Service was instituted in 1970.
However, the Interdepartmental Committee recommended a special honour
for foreigners, rather than the award of the DMS. The DMS was a rather large and
ponderous decoration in one class rather than as a flexible order in five
classes. At last, late in 1970,
Ambassador Roy H Coaton submitted an extensive and well-reasoned memorandum in
response to a request to explore the principles and process of instituting an
honour for foreigners.[iii] Unlike the 1952 military honours instituted
at the instance of the Minister of Defence, FC Erasmus, who was obsessed with
nationalist symbolism, there was no apparent political or ideological motive
involved. Explaining that the Cabinet
had decided on 18 May, 1970, to institute an honour Afor
conferment on foreigners “the paper argues that since reciprocity was important
and orders played a large part in foreign honours Awe
have no option but to project our decoration from the pattern of an ‘order and
so to designate it.” [iv]
It
referred to earlier proposals and described the attitudes to accepting foreign
honours in the Transvaal and Orange Free State republics. Some comparative data on orders accorded both
to citizens and foreigners was drawn from a variety of countries, mainly South
American, including Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Peru, Venezuela, and also from
Egypt, Iceland, Iran, Lebanon, and Pakistan.
Various names were considered for the proposed honour, but because they
duplicated existing military honours or foreign orders, the choice fell on the Order
of Good Hope. Coaton, whose
suggestion it seems to have been, was of the opinion that ‘it translates well
and sounds good in any language.’
The
Order was eventually instituted for the admission of foreign civilians and
members of armed forces who had distinguished themselves by their services in
promoting South Africa's international relations and who had earned the
respect and gratitude of South Africa.[vi] This type of order, intended for ceremonial
and diplomatic use, is not common. The
majority of countries seem to prefer to make foreigners honorary or associate
members of their various orders. The
concept of a special order seems to be seen as having the advantage of ensuring
that the motives for awarding honours to one=s own
citizens do not take on a political colour.
Perhaps, also, honours do not appear to be cheapened by the admission of
foreign political figures where merit for the award may not be absolutely
clear. In 1978 the Department of
Defence decided to consider instituting a similar honour since they found the
Department of Foreign Affairs=s
procedures too slow. The concept of a special
honour was rejected, however. In a
memorandum , Lieutenant General H deV du Toit, the Chief of Staff of
Intelligence, whose brief included military foreign relations, wrote that an
honour would have “... more value for a recipient if he knows he is receiving
an existing order and not simply something for foreigners ... “.
He went on that the existing Order of the
Star of South Africa, then a military order of two classes for officers of
general’s rank would be ‘... appropriate
to link the holder to South Africa’.[vii] Accordingly, the advice the Department of
Defence tendered to the State President was that the OSSA become an
order with a parallel civilian division which would also be open to foreign
military personnel. [viii]
Structure of the
Order of Good Hope
The
structure adopted for the Order of Good Hope was similar to that of most
modern orders. The office bearers of the
Order were the State President as Grand Master of the Order, the Minister of
Foreign Affairs as Grand Chancellor and Depositary of the Order, and the
Secretary of Foreign Affairs as Secretary of the Order and Keeper of the
Register, a post originally meant for the Chief of Protocol.
In
1985, a Committee of Inquiry into orders and decorations, chaired by Supreme
Court Judge Victor Hiemstra, submitted a report to the State President. A result of its recommendations was that
orders were placed under the control of an Advisory Committee of Orders. The Secretary-General of the President's
Office was now Chancellor of the Chancery of Orders and the State President
became the Patron of the Order and no longer Grand Master. The reintroduction of the restriction to
foreign citizens for the Order of Good Hope was also included in the
changes. The strange custom of adding in
brackets the words AGold@ and ASilver@ after the titles Grand Cross and
Grand Officer was also introduced.
Indeed, this usage as well as others in the 1988 Warrant, such as a
provision for posthumous awards and references to the classes as 'orders',
indicated a complete misunderstanding of orders - despite the work of the
Hiemstra Committee and the existence of a Chancery. [ix]
The
Order was initially organized in four classes with a Special Class or Grand
Collar, preceding and apart from the four classes of Grand Cross, Grand
Officer, Commander and Officer.
It was reserved for heads of state and in special cases for heads of government. Coaton had proposed the structure "...
in any event eschewing the appellation >knight= (very frequently encountered even in
modern orders) as quite out of keeping with our South African tradition.@
Conditions for admission to the various classes were narrowly defined to
reflect the rank or official status of the recipient. The proposed qualifications for admission to
the order retained almost unchanged as they were in the 1973 Warrant, but the
1987 Warrant abolished the Special Class and provided for the addition
of the fifth class of Member.
On
assumption of the office of Grand Master by the State President, it was
deemed that he was awarded the Special Class. After its abolition in
1987 heads of state and, in special cases, heads of government qualified for
the First Class i.e., Grand Cross. For each class particular categories
of merit were prescribed, in rather inflexible and unnecessary detail – again
revealing a misapprehension of the character of honours and the traditional
intentions behind their organization.
Thus, those considered to have performed 'excellent meritorious' (sic)
service in the interests of South Africa could also be appointed to this class.
Coaton=s
original formulations seemed more apt and less tortuous.
The
Second Class, or Grand Officer, was open to heads of government,
ministers, supreme court judges, presidents of legislative bodies, secretaries
of state, ambassadors extraordinary and plenipotentiary, commanders-in-chief
of the armed forces, and other functionaries and persons of comparable rank
and station. Others, regarded as having
rendered outstanding meritorious service in the interests of South Africa,
could also be appointed to this class.
Members of legislative bodies, envoys extraordinary and ministers
plenipotentiary, general officers of the armed forces other than commanders-in-chief,
other functionaries and persons of comparable rank and station and also those
who had rendered exceptionally meritorious service could qualify for the Third
Class, that of Commander. Chargés
d=affaires, consuls general, colonels and
lieutenant-colonels or equivalent ranks, other functionaries and persons of
comparable rank and station and persons who had rendered meritorious service
could be admitted to the Fourth Class, that of Officer. Finally, the Fifth Class, or that of Member,
was open to secretaries of diplomatic missions, consuls, lower ranking officers
of the armed forces and other officials or persons of comparable rank and
station and to persons who have rendered exceptional service in the interests
of the Republic. [x]
[i] 'Government Notice No. 2004' of the
27 December, 1963, entitled >Rules
for the Acceptance and Wearing of Foreign Awards of Honour by South African
Citizens=, stipulated that A2.
(b) Permission will not be granted to - (i) South African diplomatic,
consular and other representatives abroad when leaving their stations on
transfer or final retirement; and (ii) officers of the State visiting foreign
countries officially or otherwise.@ Government
Gazette, No.684 of 27 December, 1963. These provisions were omitted from
the Rules from 1980 onwards. Government Gazette, No.7267 of 24 October,
1980, and Government Gazette, No.10106 of 28 February, 1986 – which has
never been brought up to date.
[ii] The minute dated 4 September,
1969, appears on 113/35/4, volume 1. The
members of the Committee were the Secretaries of the Prime Minister's Office,
the Interior, Justice, and Cultural Affairs, as well as the Commandant-General
of the Defence Force and the Commissioner of Police.
[iii] Memorandum AProposed South African Decoration for
Citizens of Foreign Countries@,
113/35/4 dated 25 November, 1970. There
is reference in this memorandum to Cabinet Memoranda P.M. 20/35-20/3-20/18-20/7
dated 26 March, 1963, and MB C2 (38) 10A of 30 September, 1969 from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs which raised question of how to honour heads of
state, diplomats and meritorious foreigners.
A minute by CH Taljaard, Chief of Protocol, to the Interdepartmental
Committee emphasized that the author of the paper had devoted 'much study' to
the question.113/35/4PRO.
[iv] Originally based on the concept of
devout knights formed as brotherhoods of soldier-monks during the Crusades,
orders, when constituted according to custom, are associations of members
organised hierarchically. After the
Crusades, the concept was secularised into military and ceremonial orders, to
which members were admitted for meritorious conduct in war or in service to the
monarch, e.g., the Spanish Order of Calatrava established in 1158, and
the British Most Noble Order of the Garter founded in 1348. While the older orders consisted of only one
class, Napoleon's Ordre de la Légion d=Honneur
(instituted on 29 Floréal of the Year X of the Revolution, that is, 19 May
1802) established the concept of five classes or ranks through which members
could be promoted for continuing merit.
This has been followed widely by other countries. Rather than being mere badges, the honour
they bestow is that of admission to one of the classes or ranks of rather
exclusive associations - which have fewer members higher in the hierarchy. See Ackermann, GA, Ordensbuch - sämtlicher
in Europa blühender und erloschener Orden und Ehrenzeichen, Reprint-Verlag
Leipzig, Leipzig, n.d. (1855); Administration des Monnaies et Medailles, Décorations
Officielles Françaises, Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 1956; Hieronymussen, P
Orders, Medals and Decorations of Britain and Europe, Blandford Press,
London, 1975.
[v]
Memorandum dated 3 December, 1970, on the design. Cabinet Memorandum sent in February, 1971, to
all Ministers and another of 10 February, requested Cabinet approval, MB5/1/1
(C2) (44). A letter to the Mint, on 4
March 1971, warned of the demands the insignia would set and resulted in
manufacturing simplification. On 5
March, 1971 quotations for ribands were requested from the well-known British
manufacturer, Toye & Co. A note to
the Chief of Protocol of 8 March, 1971, asked for the manufacture of a
Register. The Warrant, drafted by
Coaton, was not sent to the Interdepartmental Committee until 8 June. Only the Defence Force responded, enquiring
about the absence of provisions for presenting examples of insignia to museums,
the wearing of insignia by women, the cancellation of appointments, and for the
cessation of wearing the insignia of lower classes upon promotion within the
order. They expressed a preference for
the more standard five classes, with the fifth class of Member. Finally, they enquired about the absence of
provision for what was wrongly called 'post-nominal titles', more correctly
'post-nominal abbreviations'. To the
latter enquiry Taljaard simply replied that the Order would not be associated
with titles although post-nominal abbreviations had originally been
contemplated. Tender Board approval was
requested on 17 September, 1971 and Treasury authority to establish a new item
under Sub-head AE@ was requested on 7 October, 1971. The Language Services Bureau was sent the
Warrant on the 23 September.
[vi] Cabinet Minute No.275 dated 22
February, 1973, asked for an order to be instituted for Aforeigners who had distinguished
themselves in the mutual advancement of international relations between the
countries they represented and South Africa@. File 113/35/4 (32).>Warrant
relating to the Order of Good Hope=,
No.R311 dated 2 March, 1973, Government Gazette, No. 3793 of 2 March,
1973. On 23 March, 1973, the Secretary
sent a note verbale to all heads of foreign missions in Pretoria
enclosing a copy of the Government Gazette of the 2 March. See also Warrant dated 18 December, 1986, Government
Gazette, No.10574, vol. 259, dated 9 January, 1987.
[vii] Minute HSP (2) 104/13/1/14 of the
27 September, 1978.
[viii] Designs were forwarded by Cabinet
Minute to the State President, 17 October 1978.
The Warrant Ato
institute a civilian section [sic] of the Order of the Star of South Africa@, signed by the Minister of Defence and
the State President, BJ Vorster, was published in Government Gazette No.
6193 dated 20 October 1978. Changes
to the metals of the badges and the riband for the civilian division indicated
differences much the same as the Order of the British Empire. See Recommendation by General MA deM Malan,
Chief of the SA Defence Force, in Minute 12/Oct/78, in GP6CSP Box 945
104/13/1/14 Award of SA Orders, Decorations and Medals to Foreigners, and Verslag:
Komitee van Ondersoek na Dekorasies en Medaljes in die SAW, (ie, 'Report:
Committee of Enquiry into Decorations and Medals in the SADF') Letter 103 in
MV/MS/42/2 Vol 1, Box 44 of MVB (PW Botha Series). 'State President' was the
title of the head of state of the South African Republic (1860-1902). From 1994
the South African head of State has been called the President.
[ix]
Warrant dated 5 October, 1988, in Government Gazette, No. 11547, Vol.
280, dated 21 October, 1988. The changes
did not meet with the Director-General's unqualified approval according to
Minute 113/35/4 of 11 August, 1994 addressed to the Chancellor of Orders. The
usage of adding the metal to the designation persists with the orders
instituted since 2003, and now includes 'platinum' for the highest class of one
order.
[x] The Warrant in the Government
Gazette, Vol 280 no.11547 dated 21 October, 1988, repeated the 1973 Warrant
and amended the classes to Class 1, Grand Cross (Gold); Class 2, Grand
Officer (Silver); Class 3, Commander; class 4, Officers, and class
5, that of Member.
No comments:
Post a Comment